Define the job
We identify the specific buyer, task and expected outcome before opening the product.
Our methodology
A verdict should show its work.
Our process considers product facts, representative workflows and editorial judgment so readers can decide whether our conclusion applies to them.
Map the promise
We document the product’s claims, plan limits and the alternatives a buyer is likely to consider.
Run a workflow
We use representative source material and follow the task from setup to usable output.
Record friction
We note time, failed attempts, limits, export quality and the moments that still require manual work.
Price the result
We compare the cost with time saved, output gained and credible substitutes—not features in isolation.
Publish & revisit
Testing status, update date and commercial relationships stay visible. Material changes trigger a review.
Scoring policy
Scores are a summary, not the evidence.
Final grades reflect workflow fit, usability, output quality, reliability, value and support. A product can score highly for one audience and remain the wrong purchase for another.
Products under evaluation receive no final score. Material product changes trigger updates to our conclusions and recommendations.